Monitoring implementation of the Standard Rules

Global Overview South-North Center
For the Office of the UN Special Rapporteur on Disability, June 2006

View the Presentation in Power Point, File size: 93KB (Microsoft Office 97-2003 version or more).
View the Presentation in PDF, File size: 5.77MB (Adobe Acrobat reader)

Presentation Content:

  1. Rule 20:
    Monitoring

    States are responsible for the continuous monitoring and evaluation of the implementation of national pragrammes and services concerning the equalization of opportunities for persons with disabilities

  2. Information presented was gathered from 113 countries that responded to the Global Survey on Government Action on the equalization of opportunities for persons with disabilities

  3. What actions has your government taken to ensure monitoring of the implementation of national programmes and services for the equalization of opportunities for persons with disabilities?
    • Establishing a formal definition of disability
    • Creating a specialized monitoring body
    • Collecting census data
    • Conducting a sample Survey
    • Using records from service providers (ministries, hospitals, educational institutions)
    • Using information gathered by DPOs

  4. Establishing a formal definition of disability
    • 54 countries answered No
    • 54 countries answered Yes
    • Answers from 5 countries were unclear

  5. Creating a specialized monitoring body
    • 66 countries answered No
    • 43 countries answered Yes
    • answers from 4 countries were unclear

  6. Collecting census data
    • 54 countries answered No
    • 55 countries answered Yes
    • answers from 4 countries were unclear

  7. Conducting a sample survey
    • 63 countries answered No
    • 46 countries answered Yes
    • answers of 4 countries were unclear

  8. Establishing a national registrar
    • 82 countries answered No
    • 27 countries answered Yes
    • answers from 4 countries were unclear

  9. Using records from service providers
    • 55 countries answered No
    • 54 countries answered Yes
    • answers from 4 countries were unclear

  10. Using information gathered by organizations of people with disabilities
    • 54 countries answered No
    • 55 countries answered Yes
    • answers from 4 countries were unclear

  11. Does monitoring and evaluation cover
    • Size, scope and prevalence of disability
    • Types of disability
    • Age distribution
    • Gender distribution
    • Geographic distribution
    • Organizations of PWD
    • Programmes for PWD
    • Service provision organizations
    • Service provision personnel

  12. Size, scope and prevalence of disability
    • 59 countries answered No
    • 50 countries answered Yes
    • answers from 4 countries were unclear

  13. Types of disability
    • 47 countries answered No
    • 62 countries answered Yes
    • answers from 4 countries were unclear

  14. Age distribution
    • 54 countries answered No
    • 55 countries answered Yes
    • answers from 4 countries were unclear

  15. Gender distribution
    • 57 countries answered No
    • 52 countries answered Yes
    • answers from 4 countries were unclear

  16. Geographical distribution
    • 59 countries answered No
    • 50 countries answered Yes
    • answers from 4 countries were unclear

  17. Organization of PWD ( including number, size, type, scope, coverage, activities)
    • 65 countries answered No
    • 43 countries answered Yes
    • Answers from 5 countries were unclear

  18. Programmes for PWD ( including nature, number, capacity, scope, activities, effectiveness
    • 65 countries answered No
    • 43 countries answered Yes
    • answers from 5 countries were unclear

  19. Service provision organizations (number, type, capacity, scope, locations, gender)
    • 72 countries answered No
    • 38 countries answered Yes
    • answers from 3 countries were unclear

  20. Service provision personnel (number, type, training, specialization, gender, age)
    • 82 countries answered No
    • 28 countries answered Yes
    • answers from 3 countries were unclear

  21. Is information from monitoring and evaluation used in
    • Policy making
    • Adaptation and improvement of services
    • Revision and restructuring of programmes
    • Public dissemination
    • Awareness raising programmes
    • Annual and periodic national development reports
    • Research

  22. Policy making
    • 48 countries answered No
    • 63 countries answered Yes
    • answers from 2 countries were unclear

  23. Adaptation and improvement of services
    • 53 countries answered No
    • 58 countries answered Yes
    • answers from 2 countries were unclear

  24. Revising and restructuring programmes
    • 55 countries answered No
    • 56 countries answered Yes
    • answers from 2 countries were unclear

  25. Public dissemination
    • 70 countries answered No
    • 41 countries answered Yes
    • answers from 3 countries were unclear

  26. Awareness raising programmes
    • 57 countries answered No
    • 54 countries answered Yes
    • answers from 2 countries were unclear

  27. Annual and periodic national development reports
    • 56 countries answered No
    • 55 countries answered Yes
    • answers from 2 countries were unclear

  28. Research
    • 69 countries answered No
    • 42 countries answered Yes
    • answers from 2 countries were unclear

  29. What does that mean?
    • In more than 50% of countries that responded to our survey, no action was taken to ensure monitoring and evaluation of disability programmes in the implementation of the Rules.
    • Less than 50% applied one measure or more.
    • Even when measures were implemented, there was a no consistency of the procedures taken
    • Establishing definition 47%
    • Creating specialized monitoring 38%
    • Collecting census data 48%.

  30. What does that mean?
    • In more than 50% of countries that responded to our survey, no action was taken to ensure monitoring and evaluation of disability programmes in the implementation of the Rules.
    • Less than 50% applied one measure or more.
    • Even when measures were implemented, there was a no consistency of the procedures taken
    • Establishing definition 47%
    • Creating specialized monitoring 38%
    • Collecting census data 48%.


Home | About Us | Contact Us | Site Map
Copyright © 2009